How Using the Right Compensation Models Can Benefit Your Project?
Compensation models vary, and using the right one can benefit both parties, Clients, and Consultants, also ensure everyone is happy and gives their best to the project.
Every project is different, so choosing the best Compensation model can have a great impact on the ROI of the project. To maximize your benefits, take the time to evaluate and select the Compensation model you think is right for you and your organization.
Now let’s dive into the most used Compensation models and see how you can make your dream project happen while properly compensating your Consultants
How Using the Right Compensation Models Can Benefit Your Project?
Here is how this works – If you want to optimize your consulting spend, you might be tempted to attack the cost base with traditional cost-cutting measures (reducing budgets, negotiating discounts, setting up multiple validations, etc.). Even though this can provide short-term results, we should not lose sight of the fact that using consultants is about value creation. As such, despite all the bad press about consultants and their fees, discussions should primarily be about impact and value.
Now, let’s review the most used Compensation models:
1. Deliverable-based fees or flat fee
Most Consulting firms use the flat fee structure for their projects. The Consultant will evaluate the work to be done and staff a little team. The total fee will reflect the total cost of the team to provide the work.
Pros: The Consulting team will do the work even if the workload is higher than expected. The risk for the Client is limited. Incentives for the Consultants are through repeat business and resource optimization.
Cons: The Client pays the amount agreed, even if the consulting team does the work faster than expected. The Consultant can be tempted to “supercharge” their resources to mitigate the risks. The Consultant can allocate resources to the proposal that will never work on the project to create a buffer.
2. Time-based fees or daily rates
This system is very common, in particular with small projects and independent consultants. It can also apply to interim management assignments. The Consultant will define a daily rate, and invoice the Client based on the number of days actually worked for the Client.
Time-based fees will be perfect for projects where you mostly need extra arms and legs such as interim management, or spot team reinforcement.
Pros: The Client will only pay for the work done and time spent.The fee structure is particularly transparent and adapted to projects with a finite duration.
Cons: A low-performing consultant will charge more days. Besides, the incentives for the Consultants are to stay longer to charge more. And what happens if you are not available and the work cannot progress as planned? The Client has little control over the total cost of the project. The risk is mostly on the Client’s side.
“As a consultant at McKinsey, I learned the value of data and the ability to shape that information into an answer.” – Pete Buttigieg .
READ ALSO
“Demand management allows the teams to make the difference between the “must have” and the “nice to have.” You can keep your money for what is really important.”
3. Retainer-based fees
When a client needs continuous part-time support, s/he can opt for retainer-based fees. The Consultant and the Client agree on a number of days per week/month/quarter where the Consultant will be on “stand-by.” The retainer can be paid in a lump sum or on a monthly basis, independently of the work done by the Consultant.
Pros: The Consultant has to stay on top of the Client’s organization and priorities. The Client is sure to have access to the Consultant for the agreed period. This type of model works particularly well when deliverables are unclear and can change during the assignment.
Cons: The consultants can have several projects at the same time. The “retainer” client is not always their #1 priority as that project is secured. Some consultants tend to consider retainers as paid commercial time.
4. Value-based Pricing
Value-based pricing is a pricing strategy where the prices are set not on time and materials, or cost + margin, but rather on the perceived value for the Client of the service delivered. For Consulting services, it could be a share of the savings realized in a cost-cutting project, for instance.
Pros: The clients and the consultants share the same interests: the more value created, the more value for each party. The risk for the Client is very limited. The Client only has to commit to a small flat fee.
Cons: The baseline and the conditions of success have to be defined very precisely, so the Client doesn’t end up paying more than the value really created. The model is more difficult to apply for intangible deliverables with no direct, measurable impact on P&L. Traditional consultancies are reluctant to use this fee structure that does not fit their pricing and risk management models (you cannot reserve a team of four consultants from the pool when the payment for only two can be secured).
5. Value Sharing – a Win-win Proposition
More and more consultancies are exploring ways to share the value with their clients. The movement started with Bain & Company when they moved from pure strategy work to more operational support.
Value-sharing fees make sense when the stakes are high, and you expect the consultants to go above and beyond their normal delivery by aligning their interests with yours and giving them, beyond the sole repeat business, the perspective of a substantial upside in case of success. Classical cases will include cost-saving programs, pricing optimization, and a new business launch. To mitigate the risk, you will have to implement governance to make sure the activities (and how they are performed) remain in line with your overall strategy and culture. Indeed, the consultants will take a very active role in the execution of the project, but you remain at the bar. And what are the expectations beyond their normal job that would justify a special bonus?
The catch, when using value-sharing, is to define clearing the starting point and the parameters involved in the measure.
In conclusion, for each project, you can identify the fee structures that will yield more value for your company. It will depend on the type of project, the nature of the deliverables, the context of the project, the flexibility you have on fees, and the level of commitment you expect from the Consultant.
Hélène Laffitte is the CEO of Consulting Quest, a Global Performance-Driven Consulting Platform and author of “Smart Consulting Sourcing”, a step by step guide to getting the best ROI from your consulting. With a blend of experience in Procurement and Consulting, Hélène is passionate about helping Companies create more value through Consulting.
Consulting sourcing tips
How to negotiate framework agreements for consulting to your advantage?
How to negotiate framework agreements for consulting to your advantage?
Make-or-buy for consulting services 101
Make-or-buy for consulting services 101
Previous Weeks’ issues
How Restaurants Are Cooking Up Success in a Changing World | This Week in Consulting
In this edition of This Week in Consulting, we offer insights into the latest challenges, innovations, and strategies driving growth and resilience in the restaurant industry.
Challenges and Transformations in the Global Chemical Industry | This Week in Consulting
In this edition of This Week in Consulting, we explore key pricing strategies, challenges, and how to stay competitive by examining various pricing models, highlighting their pros and cons.
Choose the best next step for you
Buy the Book
Talk to us
Hélène Laffitte is the CEO of Consulting Quest, a Global Performance-Driven Consulting Platform and author of “Smart Consulting Sourcing”, a step by step guide to getting the best ROI from your consulting. With a blend of experience in Procurement and Consulting, Hélène is passionate about helping Companies create more value through Consulting.
